Starbucks has been in the news quite a lot recently… Howard’s email on why the stores don’t have the same “brand love” going on they once did… problems with opening the Forbidden City site (which I believe is really wrong!)… and now out of London… Starbucks is launching its own record label, Starbucks Records, and top names in music are already being linked to the venture, possibly including former Beatle, Paul McCartney.
The brand says it will sign established and new artists to the new label, which builds on in-roads into music that the coffee chain has already made. The chain has already released albums under the label Hear Music, which licensed songs from other companies… Under the new label, Starbucks Records, the chain will be able to pick and choose artists and music that adhere more greatly to its brand identity… Starbucks has opened four Hear Music Coffeehouses where visitors are able to purchase music and burn it to CDs.
Source: Joanne Payne, Brand Republic 13-Mar-07
Now, I understand the CDs have been a hit in the stores. I’ve picked up two myself. But when does a coffee company decide to go into music? And extend the brand name into this arena? Has no one over there studied positioning?I quote from the master Al Ries “Customers want brands that are narrow in scope and distinguishable by a single word, the shorter the better.” Coffee. Music. Only one, Starbucks.
I’m not saying Starbucks the entity cannot go into music. Hear Music should become that brand and supported with dollars rather than stretch Starbucks to try and mean two things in people’s heads… because it is not going to. And I predict, more people will question the quality of the coffee (are they focussing on this at all?) when they start seeing music of Starbucks artists.
Who do you think you are?


